most comic circumstances, it was recently discovered that a number of posts were misplaced by blogger and shall be reinstated in due course. the sadoo vicariously apologizes for any resultant inconvenience and in the meantime resumes his life as a mumbler of poetry and explorer of arcane mysteries. also in the meantime, blogger is exploring an obscure technical defect and expresses its hopes to this blogger and its humble readership that, in the best manner of a customer-centered organization, a satisfactory solution will be implemented as soon as possible.
17.12.12
14.12.12
daodejing lxiv
It is easy to maintain a situation while it is
still secure.
It is easy to deal with a situation before
symptoms develop.
It is easy to break a thing when it is yet
brittle.
It is easy to dissolve a thing when it is yet
minute.
Deal with a thing while it is still nothing.
Keep a thing in order before disorder sets in.
A tree that can fill the span of a man’s arms
grows from a downy tip.
A terrace nine storeys high rises from hodfuls
of earth.
A journey of a thousand miles starts from
beneath one’s feet.
Whoever does anything to it will ruin it;
whoever lays hold of it will lose it.
Therefore the sage, because he does nothing,
never ruins anything and, because he does not lay hold of anything, loses
nothing.
In their enterprises the people always ruin them
when on the verge of success.
Be as careful at the end as at the beginning and
there will be no ruined enterprises.
Therefore the sage desires not to desire
And does not value goods which are hard to come
by.
Learns to be without learning
And makes good the mistakes of the multitude
In order to help the myriad creatures to be
natural and to refrain from daring to act.
Always in the Dao a fish, deeply set, sensed,
known, perhaps even loved, by the sage. Below,
some membrane separating words and things.
Is it feral? Whose desire is it
for it to be set free, to be loosed into the human circus: another flood, another olympian drama? Can anything be done to it? Can it be
ruined? Is it possible even to stretch
one’s hand through the membrane and touch it?
What are the methods for its description? Is this stretching, this setting free, the
reason for humanity, its being and becoming, the arc of history, time’s
timeless blood?
We exist on a murky equilibrium, an unseen
fulcrum. The sage knows the feel of the
pivot as life whirls around and she is somehow not undone. For to
deal with a thing while it is still nothing, you must know nothing. You must know how it feels to
attempt to get the fish to leave, to grasp its scales, to know ruin, to have
attempted to have become the slippery spirit of desire, suck on its piscine
heart, been spat back to land, unloved, unnamed, unbecome.
But, in that Daoist twist, the scales—those
energies of all seduction—are not known by grasping or doing but by grasping not-grasping
and doing not-doing. The sage does not
lay hold, but lies on the membrane, watching the fish, watching the grasping,
watching the watching watching the fish.
The sage does not seduce or is not seduced in the usual ways, but
through the eyes on the membrane on the fish on the deep. So things get done, though no one really
knows how. So ways are walked, and the
walking is not a method, a program, a measure, but a step, and another, and
another, and that is all: this the
vision and the eyes and the learning and the care.
In the Dao a fish and in a fish the Dao. Untouched, bound, and in its binding free.
5.12.12
tao te ching lxiii
The sadoo returns to the Tao Te Ching after a hiatus--
Do that
which consists in taking no action, pursue that which is not meddlesome, savor
that which has no flavor.
Make the
small big and the few many. Do good to
him who has done you an injury.
Lay plans
for the accomplishment of the difficult before it becomes difficult. Make something big by starting with it when
small.
Difficult
things in the world must have their beginnings in the easy. Big things must have their beginnings in the
small.
Therefore
it is because the sage never attempts to be great that he succeeds in becoming
great.
One who
makes promises rashly rarely keeps good faith.
One who is in the habit of considering things easy meets with frequent
difficulties.
Therefore even the sage treats some things as
difficult. That is why in the end no
difficulties can get the better of him.
The Dao is a self-sustaining spiritual ecosystem,
using the materials of destruction to destroy destruction, enabled to do this through
its core use: using use to achieve
non-use. For doing is usually active,
pursuing meddlesome, savoring flavorful.
The small is usually just small, the few few, and greatness a result of
effort. What is this spiritual magic
show, pulling big from small, many from few, good from injury, greatness from
nothing, action from no-action, and flavor from no-flavor? A linguistic game, an inane delusion, a mind
so imbalanced it’s upside down, hanging from itself?
Perhaps. But
it could simply be a graceful imaginative act:
seeing the world in your beloved or without stirring abroad.
The Dao itself is a manual for this seeming
sleight-of-hand: using word to get
beyond word, language to deconstruct language (long before deconstructionism). But once language is deconstructed through the Dao, there is
not nothingness but a way of nothing, not emptiness but an empty path.
Unlike the dominant forms of religious and
secular moralities, the Dao never attempts to be good or to eradicate or
condemn evil; instead it asks how great the distance is between the two and in
asking, in not defining, dissolves the duality.
It pursues non-pursuit, creates by turning back to old ruts.
I wait at Yonge and Bloor for the scramble to
open. In waiting and in scrambling i
immerse myself, naturally, with minimal cost, in the waiting and scrambling
that comprises life. This little waiting becomes the waiting the bureaucrat does for the president, the general
for the enemy to finish a mistake, the universe to end or expand, the pain of
unrequited love; this little scrambling becomes the way through, the cessation
of unsustainable pollution, an order of chaos.
This smallness is not done from volition, from
frivolity, self-effacement, inferiority or ressentiment, from spiritual principles
or guidelines, some text, but from an almost unthinking unwilled unassuming efficiency
of nature—this self-sustaining ecosystem called Dao which the world tries vainly
to emulate visibly through green technologies and spiritual systems.
Yet here it is.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)