Showing posts with label communication. Show all posts
Showing posts with label communication. Show all posts

20.1.14

ULICA LUTK


The gods inhabiting doubt don’t seem to be inclined to show themselves in manners resembling anything we normally would consider divine or any purported demonic opposition, but neither do they feign to assume human garb.  What then are these creatures (though they be not creatures) and how do they inhabit?

We shall begin with an experience i had recently when drunk in the alleys of Seville, that despicable administrative region of the nation of a doubtful Slovenia.  Nothing had gone right that day.  My father called to inform me my mother had cancer and would die within three months.  My ex-wife called and said she wanted to get remarried.  My brother-in-law called from emerg to say my sister was having a breakdown and was being interrogated by psychiatric interns with no direct experience of the mind’s stranger choreographies—only textbook systematizations and rote vocabularies and envied paychecks.  And in the wee hours of the early morning i had resumed a sexual relationship with a woman who was into extispicy, expired air ventilation and quitting smoking.  Naturally when night came i boozed.

I knew the alleys sufficiently.  They turned into each other like deranged marshmallows.  Transactions occurred of a nature so dubious, so outside the law, that any jurisprudence would have to entirely reinvent itself to take them into account.  By daytime, though, the alleys were exuberances of commerce—wallets flashing like pedophiles, scarves and cravats and bootlaces, fractal romanescos and sexy kuritakes and swabs of turducken terrine with dates and plover eggs and seasoned bustards spilling over coloured tables, and everything singing with the excess of itself.  Near nightfall the shoppers would thin and disappear and the merchants would then hastily pack up and fold their stalls and scurry out, as if they were cockroaches and someone had flicked the light on.  A limbo then occurred in which nothing happened but a silent waiting for the night and its tangled cultures.  It was then i would enter, inebriated, desperate for respite from the arrows of routine, from the protocols of opposition.

That week i sought a friend skilled in the arts of such matters.  He lived in a garret off the Ulica Lutk and mumbled the fragments of sages into broken carafes.  His name was lost and i called him Substantive, as a euphemism and term of endearment and joke, though neither of us laughed.  Interrupted by unhinged doors and tomblike corridors through which ghosts lolled like dustbunnies, there were uncountable twisted stairs to his forgotten hovel which he could only afford by doing free curses for the landlord—long horrible affairs, rife with decibels and spittle, that terrified those in arrears to steal or prostitute their daughters or murder, as long as rent was paid.  We had met in the theater at the opening weekend of The Thing, he with fantasies of doing domestic work at the South Pole, me with a ticket i had found while recovering my glasses from behind the toilet at a soggy waffle place near the condemned sanatorium in which Lucia had finally fully lost her mind a few years prior during that spring in which the blossoms danced like hesperides and no one got the flu.

Haven’t suffered enough, he said, after we had settled into Turkish coffees as thick as madness and he had rearranged the taxidermy specimens so that we could squeeze ourselves into rough spaces between once loved or beaten pets on lumpy dolorous couches which seemed to chant in low scratchy voices of springier and firmer days.

What has that got to do with it?

Haven’t suffered enough, don’t see them.

What happens when you’ve suffered enough?

Not there, they’re inside you—hardly suffered, suffered enough.  The in-betweens, they make them appear.

It’s too easy to blame it on the booze.  We all know that at some level alcohol speaks the truth more ripely, with more imaginative precision and imagistic exactitude, than the tinny truisms of sobriety.  That’s why we drink.  Not to open legs or forget the whipped horrors of existence or even dance with more limbs than we thought we had … but to glimpse what is, however shady, veiled and smelly it might be.

Most truth—the common kinds that cause lukewarm heads to nod lukewarmly—is like an uncooked head of cauliflower.  True and not imperfect in its cruciferous and fractal glory.  Yet it is not the truth that drives us humans on.  Something must be done to the cauliflower.  It must be chopped and garlic added, maybe a bit of reggiano and olive oil, a plop of parsley, roasted until hot and golden, eaten to the tunes of Arvo Pärt and arguments over the attributes that distinguish film from literature or whether religion and secularism are the same.  Booze does this.  Booze is a cooked and wondrous cauliflower.  It shows us what is there.

So i step into the Sevillan maze, that medley of alleys, drunk and desperate, eager for truth.  The smell of merchants has begun to dissipate and the air is expectant and stiff.  Brick buildings of indeterminate age, their windows viscous and unopened, sit stolidly on the sidelines, devoid of any signs of life, as the sun does its daily dance into the grave of the heavens.  There was little discussion of the alleys in the polite society of Seville.  People talked of bargains, of having whittled the price of some haberdasher down to something one could boast about.  They talked of under-ripe avocados and fuzzy fungi and the latest lace.  They talked of days.  They talked of sun-sanctioned fiscal-driven business-blessed products, and then they stopped, like clams, and spoke of happy exhibitions in galleries, and maybe the price of theater tickets and the increasing quantity and quality of weddings and, if efficacious, one or two of the deceased.  The alleys i am entering are entered more than spoken of, and those of us who enter aren’t normally invited to the parties of Seville.

I saw him next under the destitution of a full moon in the smoky geometries of an undecided evening by a polluted creek on the outskirts of love.  Jackalopes, squirradgers, wombines, elephaffes, pysons, donmels, vulphins, and raphonamites lurked in the fuliginous night, gnawing on each other.  He was in the crook of a tree, screaming at unseen enemies, in a loincloth, stuffed with vatic wisdoms.  I threw some pinecones, drawing his ire and attention.

le bruit des cabarets la fange des trottoirs! verfremdungseffekt! petite madeleine! anosognosia! inter alia sophrosune sub-iectum! une riche et inutile survivance! wie es auch sie das leben es ist gut! reines bewusstsein! die schwärmerei! ho hum! l’éphémère ébloui vole vers toi chandelle crépite flambe et dit bénissons ce flambeau! ertrinken! versinken! unbewußt! Höchste! Lust!

He howled like a cloven moon, ripped off his loincloth revealing an erection which began spouting into the skies an aurora borealis of semen, greens and reds and blues of holy sperm, and threw trees and vivisected animals onto the earth like a crazed and animate piñata and i ran back to Seville, to my small apartment, and wept.

Upon his first encounter, Augustine had called them lahars of confusion, and returned to them to castrate himself over a pagan font in 392, swollen with repentance, committed to the plank of clarity, spilling the hideous blood of his testes, those thick and questing hydras, in exchange for the aseptic blood of God, returning to Hippo, never to tread again on Seville’s miasmic earth, never to look back at those purple indulgences, that tumescent sin.  In 1244 Aquinas, smitten with his vocation, ripe with holy passion, slit them off with a broken wine bottle and screamed the names of God in Spanish, which he did not know.  In 1119 Abelard, bereft less of Héloïse than of himself, sought the alleys with a butcher knife and did the deed.  Origen, apophatic and pulsing with the cries of Jesus, began the tradition in 209 when, flexible before the Lord and elastic with righteousness, he arced his body and bit them off—oh snake that devours! oh sacred sacrifice of purity! oh love!

In 1858 Baudelaire wandered in without shame or pity and lopped off the sac of a Portuguese sailor while in very congress with a corpulent Sevillan whore who smelled of turmeric and myrrh.  In 1985 Edmond Jabès, little known to history, having trekked across the desert to the mirage of questions and drank his fill, snipped them off with sheep shears and didn’t weep and died within seven years.  These are the records of castrations of the alleys of Seville in the name of the western gods and under the blankness of a blackened sun.

So i enter them, booze in my sex, a member neither of the holy nor unholy orders, neither tepid nor a scholar nor a citizen of anything resembling knowledge.  Did not Margeurite Porete write, “Are they not a miracle of an architectural prose, musical without rhythm and rhyme, supple and staccato enough to adapt to the lyrical stirrings of the soul, the undulations of dreams, and sudden leaps of consciousness, an intersecting of myriad relations?”?  Was it not Julian of Norwich who said to a budding anchoress, “Have they not within them less the mirrors we are seeking and more the labyrinths that are lost?”?

Signage is absent, the forks and interstices are wayward and seem to shift with each visit.  Like Habana, without cars or people and of widths only allowing two fattish people to pass while gently melding.  But there are people.  Yet not in any normal sense.  One sets one’s constructed personhood aside as one enters, and becomes a person of the alleys, an unfamiliar, experiencing by not experiencing, feeling the discarded subjectivities that pass as long and loosened hair, like fallen rain.

The nights melt the alleys down to a single spot that, like a mad tuba, starts all of the heart and all of the soul vibrating. But no, this uniformity of black is not the most beautiful hour.  It is only the final chord of night, when the vague and temporary citizens of the alleys have forgotten why they entered, in the deepest pangs of twilight, taking every shade to the zenith of life that, like the fortissimo of a great orchestra, is both compelled and allowed by the alleys to ring out.  Then one sees, though in an instant, though one forever doubts and though one knows most deeply, what one has come to see.

I finally found him in his laboratory in the forbidden districts of a simulated CERN, wearing only a dirty labcoat and mumbling in languages i did not know.




was scrawled on a whiteboard and he jumped from testtube to marker to vodka to testtube like a bonobo between lovers.  I sat for what may have been hours, half-watching, shifting between dream and what is ostensibly reality, while he bounced around and scrawled and drank and yelped.  I found him next to me, pawing my leg.

There, finished.

Finished? What’s finished?
Suffering formula.

You’ve solved suffering?

Solved itself.

It’s over?

Always does.



We shall begin with an experience i had recently when drunk in the alleys of Seville, and we shall end there also.  For i accidentally found myself at a soiree of a Mrs. Bimble B. L. Bomble, of 382 Rue de la Luna in the Celestetta District, not far from Nomz Bar, an absinthe haunt of mine.  Placing myself innocuously in a corner, slurping aquavit like San Pellegrino, i forced myself to listen to the conversations.

You’ve heard that Alyson’s son received the scholarship?

It was not unexpected.

How is Frederik taking the news?

Naturally, he is upset.  He can’t see past what he can’t help but feel as a betrayal.

Of course.  He should take a trip, go to India or something.  Forget about things.

The storm in the Pyrenees … do you know the total damage?

In the billions, now.  Over 3,000 dead.

Horrible.

Dr. Vertenvoken’s recent book—what a masterpiece!

I hate to say it, but I wasn’t that impressed.

Oh really!  Do tell.

While I appreciated the textures of its plot, the typically finely drawn characters, I found its sense of irony overblown, its passions pretentious, its climax unrealistic.  Too much like Flight of Magenta really, a bit of a waste of paper.

Oh Henri, you’re too harsh as usual!

The truth isn’t always pleasant dear.

She’ll die of it.

I think so too.

Soon.  She’ll die of it soon.

All the better.

We’ve had enough.

She’s gone too far.

It’s all anyone can take.

You know what they say … what you reap is …

What you sow.  It’s so true.

His best work is from his final 10 years.

Unusual.

A late bloomer they say.

What matters is the product.  Life follows its own schedule.

Magnug is doing well.

Far better than expected.

Do you think it’s time to sell?

I’d wait a week, see how Bryzon performs.

Ah, you always were a savvy one Vasiliy, a savvy one.  I like the way you think.

It’s served me well, I have to say.

An asset to our kind, you truly are, an asset to our kind.

I think we’ve finally found one!

I’m so happy for you! Who?

Pierre Lemish.  He actually played once at Wimbledon!

Really!

Didn’t place.  And I’m sure he uses the fact to bump his fees up.  But the twins love him.

It’s been such a journey for you.

She heard it from Seeba and then heard from Fransi but didn’t put two and two together and when she found out … !

I pushed my way into the middle of the crowded room, raised my hand and yelled, Friends!  The room hushed.  I am not a stranger to Seville but i am a stranger to these gatherings.  I have been in the corner—that one (i said, pointing)—listening to your … your … communication.  I have heard you talk of awards and death and charts and justice and art and the gamblings of the privileged and tennis teachers for one’s children.  Most curiously, i’ve heard no one mention what is central to Seville, what grounds and circumscribes your lives and talkings—the alleys, their effects and architecture, the society and business that transpires there at night.

The room grew quieter.  The alcohol stood still.  Ginoo Alabos, debonair musician and member of the professional avant garde, a respected professor and member of the guilds, drawing his recent tour of Hungary on Daw Jia’s lovely naked forearm, stopped and frowned.

I am a frequenter of those alleys.  I have sought God in its garbled corridors and madness in its trampled air.  Yes! God! God who is dead and yet never dies! The god who is gods and no-god and no-gods and none and all and neither.  I have sought that which cannot be found and can be known only when it is not known.  I have sought the annihilation of myself in order to find life.  I have sought to see the possibility of repairing the deep injustice of the divorce of the sacred and the profane, that life is still possible for the human.  I wish to share with you the occurrences of my most recent visit, i wish to speak of the blood on which we walk … the grammar of our walking.  I do not know if i am mad.  I do not know if the alleys are real.  I do not know what i have seen, I do not know if i have seen it, i do not know …

… We have heard all this before, Encik Mllad, a Senior Civil Servant in the Carlosian regime, interrupted. The architecture in question, since it has been mentioned, is being sealed.  Each year, fewer enter, even fewer emerge, the portals of ingress diminish, the doors of egress are closed.

There is no escape, said Zonjë Tsis. Things change.

The Councils decree it, said Gospodin Wǣs-Wǣs.  It is the only way to progress democracy.

The Ministers have approved it, said Ssi Sui G.

The remaining Monarchs have blessed it, said Whaea Wei. We must let life take its course.

The International Bodies have confirmed it, said Mevrouw Vilipa. Its time is done.

The astrological charts don’t deny it, said Seeydi Habibubad.

The computers compute it.

The scientists validate it.

The therapists, psychologists, general practitioners, specialists, neurologists, psychiatrists—with the full support of their attendant lawyers and accountants and lovers and children and masseuses and nannies and poodles and customer service representatives—systematize it and erect a program of wellness to achieve it.

The scholars profunditize it.

The artists sacralise it.

The tweeters and bloggers blab it.

The …

They didn’t try to stop me as i left or seem to notice i had gone.  No one followed me as i departed the Celestetta District and no one mentioned my having had appeared.  Daw Jia’s forearm gratefully recovered the soft map of Ginoo Alabos’s Hungary and Vertenvoken’s oeuvre continued to be explored in tones not unreminiscent of reminiscings of reminiscings.  No one found the testicles of an unnamed diplomat.  It wasn’t reported, the police knew nothing.  I went to seek my friend but he was nowhere and so i left Seville and crossed the old-fashioned way, on a ship, to New York, where I got a job as a night waiter at L’express and found a girlfriend and went to movies and made up stories of a former life.

So gods inhabit doubt through suffering, and suffering lives in the inebriated alleys of truth.  This is what i discovered in the nights of Seville, that despicable administrative region of the nation of a doubtful Slovenia, with the aid of alcohol and a man whose name is lost.

17.1.14

the impropriety of a hand of bananas






it takes centuries for words to separate themselves from the human that produced them, from the accidents of the living body, and become free.  So our judgements of contemporary writers are unstable and we must leave it to the yet-to-be-born to see the words apart from flesh’s faults.

heresiarch uzasoz





hallucination is a form of biographical transformation


                  why don’t you write sensible books that people can understand?


            ill-informed anyone who would announce himself his own contemporary

the only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time, the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn, like fabulous yellow roman candles exploding like spiders across the stars, and in the middle, you see the blue center-light pop …

my drawings inspire, and are not to be defined. They place us, as does music, in the ambiguous realm of the undetermined.

i can’t understand why people are frightened of new forms. I’m frightened of the old ones.

it is the pen which dreams






apologia

Do i need an apology for the pieces that will follow?  No, of course not.  Creation, like its destructive twin, doesn’t apologize.  It presents.
 
I do not need one, but one is required, so please accept this disingenuousness authentically, as we do the endless artifices we live within.  A caprice on my part does not have to be a caprice on yours, for those on opposite sides of what is pleasantly called the communication chasm rarely share intent, aspect, or effect, but only signs.  Signs, and a certain mood.

Some nine years ago, in one of many fits of madness, i envisioned an intricately structured collection of 81 pieces entitled mirror mirror; they were to be radical excessive even garish experiments in language, most of them starring an elusive franz von vemeer, an urban dilettante of unknown origin, a disbeliever in mirrors.  They were, if nothing else, tectonically-rupturing descents into language, into grammars of barely contained intelligibility (or barely contained unintelligibility—on the edge i work, it makes little difference).  I completed slightly over half of these, at which point i stopped—as sometimes happens, even the fragmentation began fragmenting, the sovereignty of icy exploration began seeking its impoverishment and death, producing a continent of silence, and i left the collection, wandering in other kingdoms, until the wind that evoked mirror mirror blew me back to its malefic bounds.  As the mirror is bottomless (or, rather, its bottom is not discernible), i expected the requisite forces to converge at some point, enabling me to complete the work. 


This re-convergence began happening, as is not unusual, before i began recognizing it.  And once the recognition had begun, the forms were so different (the kingdom had so changed)—and yet shared such a deep geological structure (certain distinctive linguistic-cultural proclivities)—that, if not delighted, i was at least motivated to stay a while and see what happened.

So i placed the new forms (of which there are about a dozen so far) in the second half of mirror mirror.  But due to their difference, the inevitable changes, i felt they needed a name (or a sub-name) of their own; it became obvious that this must be exercises in saying nothing.  A work called mirror mirror should exit very differently than it enters, similar to the difference between how we approach a mirror when examining our face and how we leave.  Here are but a few (too many french, it’s true [but have not the french excelled beyond other races in saying nothing?]) of its influences (the well-read among my readers, if there are any remaining these hashtag days, can easily name more)—

erasmus’ copia (chapter 33 particularly)
queneau’s exercices de style
baudelaire’s le spleen de paris
foucault’s sexuality and solitude
bataille’s literature and evil
chevrier’s l’hallucination artistique
wood’s beyond the simulacrum of religion versus secularism:  modernist aesthetic “mysticism” (in religion and literature)
de lautréamont’s les chants de maldoror and poems
 




Here are but a few of its intents—



  1. to proclaim my passionate unshatterable love for the detached compassionate capricious divinity coursing through human flesh—tappable, growable, limitless, renewable—and my faith in its ability to transform devouring flesh (not its mortal attributes but its fear of the infinite finite mortalities), not primarily through technology (though using it), but through itself.
  2. to create forms that go nowhere, surprised, surprising; dramas that emerge from outside routine human drama, from these things themselves, from their forms—forms of the marrow of language:  not of us, our marrow, our gains and losses, the palpitations of our hearts, but of language’s anxieties, its holiday gatherings, family dysfunctions, its incests and love affairs and lonelinesses, quests and deserts, madnesses and laboratories, prizes and ecstasies, drugs and highs and suicides, its laughter … not about inhumans, aliens, but about humans – to modify the dominance of the human.
  3. to map a land without borders, names or technologies:  uninhabitable, uninhabited, infinite and beautiful and eternally empty; to map quests for maps for such a land.
  4. to build language pieces as abstract paintings, building them up with layers, achieving an effect, a mood, a collectivity of sensations and ideas, a loose confederate of images:  for all art is abstract, abstraction simply being the aesthetic term for interiority—or the perception of lived experience.
  5. to attempt to reflectively sound out what most societal sounds (which we euphemistically call communication) sound like to me.
  6. to describe the process by which we are forced to accept the process by which we are forced to accept living within ourselves …
  7. to be frustrating pieces to learn to read, in the way that the goldberg variations are frustrating pieces to learn to play.  One might say, Well, with the gv at least once one has learned to play them they at least sound good but your exercises—they clunk like nepalese trucks falling off the mahendra highway.  But this is not true.  You have just not learned to read.  Even if you learn to read, you may yet say, Well, ok, i have learned to read, but, still, i don’t know what it means.  Sure.  But what do the goldberg variations mean?
  8. one could say i’ve sought a space that is uncrowded, undesirable – desserts of deserts.
  9. isn’t it at some point less that we care about ending life and more that we care about joining the dead—that’s where the action is?

Here are but a few of its titles—

the difference between a tylenol 500, a gerund, and glory

            hanaϡelah and the chair

            the story of of

            haar lof and the space and twējē

At HP, we don't just believe in the power of technology, we believe in the power of people when technology works for you. We believe in applying new thinking and ideas to improve the way our customers live and work.


If you are going to do something, Make it Matter

(or [or and] ‘the fifty-move rule’)

            (or athpwe)

            hallibl and molok

            ulica lutk

            wawn wakes up

my əld leigh goshe

            andre the giant and the strawberry

            gilberta tedeschi eats her man

Here are but a few excerpts from its reviews—


    1. The positive central idea of exercises is that the human psyche, or soul, really believes in itself, and in nothing else.
    2. The author is simultaneously a terrorist of the plastic soul and a supervisor in its factories.
    3. These nothing stories find resolution in different keys, at different pitches, than routine narratives, resolution revealing itself when sufficient pointers have begun pointing, when a sufficient web has been spun for literary spiders to run across and catch prosaic prey.
    4. I cannot help but be reminded of rimbaud’s the poet makes himself a seer by a long, immense and reasoned unsettling of all the senses and mallarme’s i have no wish to pander to a reader’s need for simplification.
    5. Much of this would have to do with the grammar of hiding, of hiding in itself, and of hiding in hiding.  Communicating in poetic caesuras, executive falters, journalistic gaffes, sleeps of the tongue, these exercises are prophetic—the only future grammar is a grammar of hiding. 
    6. At best, a clandestine subjectivity; at worst, turds in a boardroom – as if lou gehrig’s disease had become spiritualized in the author.
    7. During the late second and early third millennia, the task of interpreting the psyche and art through the written word was restricted to professional technocrats (the spiritual descendants of medieval patriarchy), specifically sanctioned as scholars, therapists and psychiatrists; to interpret the psyche and art through the senses and the body became the domain of artists.  Artists (the spiritual descendants of medieval female mystics) directly experienced the psyche and art in three classical ways: first, bodily visions, meaning to be aware with one's senses—sight, sound, or others; second, ghostly visions, such as spiritual visions and sayings directly imparted to the soul; and lastly, intellectual enlightenment, where one’s mind came into a new understanding of itself and so world.  These exercises belong to all three categories and transgress in the way that all mystics transgress when they futilely attempt to translate mystic experience into language.
    8. Whitman’s song of myself has been changed to sign of myself – to what end? to what sign? to what self? to what song?
    9. I see these exercises as exercises in saying it is as if
      1. It is as if the author is translating from, say, ancient Hebrew to modern English, but trying to keep the grammar and cadences of the former.
      2. It is as if the author were given a set of random rules for each piece to establish a game inside a game inside a game – matryoshka dolls of language.
      3. It is as if Bobby Fischer came to me for advice, I certainly would not discourage him—as if anyone could—but I would try to make it positively clear that he will never have any money from chess, live a monk-like existence and know more rejection than any artist ever has, struggling to be known and accepted.
      4. It is as if the author is an unidentified thief in a global mall, in which all the stores sell language, in which a theft has not happened for ages, stealing willy-nilly, hiding his goods in the sable reaches of the night.
    10. These nothing pieces are obviously attempts to translate communicative human experiences—superficially common but emotionally bizarre—into a precise emotional language, avoiding (while pointing to) the emotional shorthand which is expected.  These are rupturous rapturous expressions which stuff emotional clichés where they belong—in toilet tanks in museums.
    11. The irony being that what is said in society that is supposed to say something says nothing and these exercises which appear to say nothing (and about which it is said they say nothing and may very well say nothing) say something.  What do they say?  They say that a formalism that says that language is not the servant of thought but thought the servant of language is not necessarily a formalism.
I shall post these pieces, at whimsy, over time.  But the reader should be warned that my intent, as always, is not to communicate (if by communication we mean anything like participate in the common transactions of the heart and mind).  But if we mean by communicate—work toward the failure of communication so that communication can be glimpsed— … well … that is another story.