5.7.19

patatalk in the areolae manasis of the boreal forest



this she says deleteriously and without any tenacious immodesty wouldn’t be the form of thought it is if it didn’t lack a certain ubiquity of absence and if this lack itself didn’t present itself almost substantively and elusively across all things

curious he responds but not too nephologically and with arcane allusions to a certain vituperation which she catches, but fleetingly, as if she were a leftfielder for a defunct mlb team and made the out then didn’t i’ve been thinking along similar lines myself or rather – as these things are – similar lines have been waiting by the platforms at various stations in my mind’s metro for trains that never seem to come

a common problem she muses as if the viscerality of her consciousness were so exposed as to place her in a situation not disanalogous to those times the time escapes us and we’re floating like emblematic beavers on kidneyshaped artificial ponds, those kinds some sometimes pay to go troutfishing in and not one without a touch of saudade, not the type you find in south america but that transplanted into language environments where some consider it an invasive plant and devote almost unreasonable volumes of time, energy and money to developing laboratories to manufacture synthetic mores to eradicate it

i know what you mean he says almost lugubriously although the weed of the saturnine rarely breaks through the asphalt of his articulations which are renowned – though this is far too forceful – in varied circles (though this may suggest a diversity not truly manifest) for their evenhandedness, one wouldn’t really say an enthusiasm or exuberance but some quality as difficult to define and perhaps unnamed as those liminal emotive states we enter when we’re granted by the gods or nature or society (depending on one’s beliefs) a temporary visa for a sort of murky tourism into the unmapped regions, but no one yet has spoken quite clearly of these tendencies in him just yesterday i think though time has been awkward recently, even extending its anxieties into spaces it usually isn’t entitled to, i was boarding a tram at aksaray when – strangely, epiphanously, rudely – a consortium of cantaloupe merchants egressed and not only prevented my travelling but necessitated a costly stay in a nearby hospice

this is fascinating she barely murmurs, and it sounds to him as though she might be faintly satirizing his fourth wife though he can’t figure out how this would be possible considering his knowledge of their networks and more particularly her temperament which would under such conditions – all the tests and indicators point to this – disallow much beyond a memory of a thought of distant mockery and he speculates it could be one of those simulating emotional aspects that refuses – through intent or whimsy, who knows? – to coincide except through those unavailable realities we sometimes glimpse when reading about a mass suicide, for example, of a minor siffleux cult in lower ghana our experiences of transit are so similar yet – since identification is difficult – in their divergence they become a misplaced reminiscence, one of those you find in a corner of a garret of someone else’s grandmother who has recently passed away not through neglect or disease or accident or even geriatricism but a tendency of those who maintain such pieces to transfer their entire will and being into objects

i could only disagree if i were one of the types capable of disagreeing with statements that appear to belong to the sorts of ones that you’ve been making he gesticulates with suburban overtures of lunacy that conjure in her mind, whose synaptic grid if it were laid out in two dimensions would deceive most accountants (regardless of their experience or perspicacity or origins) into thinking it was an electrical schematic for a future utopia designed by a scientific-engineering conglomerate so vast, illuminated and esoteric only two or three homeless hadoti gurus have dreamt its shadow, a stuffed rabbit of her childhood she had loved to such extremes her mother flushed the worn remnants down the toilet one drunken afternoon and i have to thank you – this necessity neither born from any formality or caprice – for introducing, even forcing, though i hesitate to use such diction but am compelled by an image rupturing violently in some obscure wardrobes of what few might call thinking, a train engulfed in such steam and smoke one would hardly call it a train or thought of thought and this i speculate – and i sincerely hope you’ll join me though i doubt with equal authenticity much camaraderie, not from any dislike, uncertainty or animosity but from an impulse our present space doesn’t give sufficient time to identify – is like a fuschia in some alternative dominican in a cloister’s balneary where pious penguins go to pray

and she and i continue talking in that way lacking termini and we would be chatting still (and maybe i think mostly are) if it hadn’t been for the trolley that arrived finally at the platform and she, oblivious and wise, climbed the steps and i (though the reason has never become apparent) stood motionless and waited as i had been doing for as long as i remember, waiting for another stranger to converse with, waiting for the tram i’d finally board

30.6.19

sega’s saga cinnabon saag



sadoo what have we been thinking about today

there is no today

yeah yeah what have we been thinking about

there is no we

i notice a recently opened .pdf of the scum manifesto on your desktop

there is no thinking

and a copy of industrial society and its future

the bombard heftiness residue in its palotin-merdre 2019 issue featuring can heftiness and even bombard survive distributed intelligence? contains an article on circumferential intelligence and its radical challenge that includes this chart –

mandate
scum manifesto
industrial society
overthrow
the government
the (technological) system
[government will consequently fall]
eliminate
the money system
the (technological) system
[the money system will consequently dismantle]
institute
complete automation
[it is precisely complete automation that must be destroyed]
destroy
the male sex
the (technological) system [gender is inconsequential, a distraction from the core mandate of destroying the (technological) system]

regardless of whether one follows scum or industrial this would entail a substantial remissioning of the bhr wouldn’t it

undoubtedly

what are you doing sadoo

picking my anus and flicking nanoturds at the unreaders

ooh add some to my count chocula please

these two texts – insufficiently compared in the professional comparing classes – are certainly bound and so one by their radicality and violence

but their violence is different

both authors attempted to kill people and industrial succeeds but the hoi polloi’s response to the two violences differs

it objects more to industrial

yes and no. that industrial’s violence claims a rational base disturbs the hoi polloi. scum’s easier to dismiss for them as she’s ostensibly more nuts and – as you know – her text goes so far as to cross certain lines facilitating the thought that it’s a parody

industrial was also a mathematical prodigy and professor

and the hp are trained to automatically respect such inconsequentialities

why not read instead the what in comparison at least may seem like a more balanced analysis, the social anarchists for example

these two radical texts do something others don’t. and can’t. they in a sense balance the accepted and pervasive insanity of our present world with a (commonly) unacceptable and recessive transgressive insanity – manifest in dominant society only through dreams, entertainment, art – and so distanced and ‘safe’ – and the private hells of individuals, which while ubiquitous are hidden

in other words, the imbalance of our present world demands their balancing imbalance

while they superficially and perhaps more substantively disagree they both are fundamentally oriented toward a massive intractable wholesale dissatisfaction with existing society and can see no way through but its pervasive and painful destruction

it’s true though industrial lacks a certain sense of humour that scum – intentionally or not – achieves

it’s important to remember that humour to the natural comedian isn’t humour

what is it

that’s a question only a natural comedian can answer

but indications are …

indications are humour to the natural comedian is what news or facts or expert opinion are to the hoi polloi

you mean – if i may say it – truth

if you must. root erupts through the hard sidewalk of society like an indifferent mushroom and spores what it spores. that root to the comedian is called humour by the hoi polloi but root to the hoi polloi is called sidewalk by the comedian … well … what of it

wait a minute, aren’t you quoting a future issue of the bhr

décervelage-clinamen 2027

how …

there is no today