how can an empire with a currency promoting in god we trust and founded on manifest destiny and a religion that includes in its dogma things like immaculate conceptions cosmic aliens who love whonymity binary afterlives for the faithful and sinning object to a segment of its population promoting irrational narratives? arent dumpy and its fringe followers a consequence of our delusions?
amerika remyth yourself
amerika remyths yourself
amerika remyths yourselves
amerikas remyths yourselves
ramythika remere
every nen and thow we find ourselves vaselining into your reality and flailing in the hashhoppers and dopebuggies of being and nilbeing and demibeing and the moores demi & michael and anabeing ah ana being how i remember you in the quad pissing on the juniper tree and all the other forms of being too tiresome to right now here be
even we sadaroos are necessitated by the horrible forces that yank us from the privy of imagination to the sewer of society to comment or discomment on current events although as any mystic knows every event is current and this our exuberant and acedic overwhelment
lets first acknowledge we despise droney dump as a specimen of whonymity it isnt as a model of anything it is but no model we want modelled yet its in this isnt and is and their blurrings that various unacknowledgings arise
whonyms of whatever tripe or pallor tend to be routinely amateurish at spiritual mathematix the ground and breath of all maths so that whonym x encounters whonym q and experiences what it thinks are attributes k and e at least it names what it thinks such and reaches some conclusion this is typically done in those netherregions outside of reason and consciousness not dissimilar to when k and e are coexistent then attribute d is also present and then when q rather than exhibiting d when expected exhibits instead l x is disillusioned or angry or flabbergasted or in rarer cases in love
so analogously in the dd fiasco whonyms whether on or against dds side think those against frequently conclude either directly or in roundabout ways or in the outhouses of their minds dumpys bad but oh bomb ah was good and dumpys bad but we are good as if many of the more acute insights from whonyms once stuck in history never existed collectively persisting in the most egregious whonym delusion that nature doesnt exist in its awhonymic questioning or if it does it isnt as it is massively independent of us even while we vainly attempt to eradicate it
lets look firstly at what dumpy does for the people including how it nurtures their nights and whonyms if we know anything regardless of their dogmas need their nights
none of this doubting vindicates dumpi
but doubting vindicates nothing
and none of us are vindicated
the book of questions questions
so if rumpy did all this in art that simulation of simulation it might be worthy in the words of simulation as it would then necessarily subvert itself and action would collapse but because it does in life what should be circumscribed in and born from art it fails its these shapes and movements the people miss their ignorance of the costs and principles of true iconoclasm theyre right that oh bomb ah is hardly an iconoclast but theyre wrong that dumpso is any more of one
this concatenation of assemblages these nurturings of nights provide a singular focus a rarity and good and bad dumpies and antidumpies remocrats and depublicans each according to its kind desire above all else the rare
the line according to the antidumpies as far as it goes is that barracks oh bomb ah and his descendant yo bidet and kalamata heiress are far better suited for such a distinguished role as the presidency of the disunited hates of amerikanaaah far better leaders and sadoos would mostly concur if by this we mean they more fully are aligned with whats required for sufficient management of the system in place the given that surrounds but that this system is unmanageable and the compromises required to sustain it unsustainable this can only lend any virtue to bombys cause for those whose thinking is as flawed as those they criticize
is moderation in an excessive system something to praise?
trust in an articulate truth and a particular narrative and a real reality and a common purpose and an impossible honour
oh falstaff who thrones unacknowledged in our souls
whether of dumpy or oh bomb ah you have faith in empire hope in amerika first love of the confidence game of democracy this faith and hope and love unites opponents the obsession with name and hierarchy and pomp unites
if droney yawny dumpy has any asset its to show how much we even those who technically oppose him want to drive fast how were all in death together
bidet may be cliché
& dump may appear to the illiterate to break the cliché
dump may be necessary according to those psychohistorical algorithmic postulates but then so may bidet and the ass knows bidet comes after dump in time
who gets excited by any of this?
each oh ddoh & bomboh are novels
this wee antinovel in the antinovel sadoo about two novels
its novels & antinovels all the way down
but you say this is dangerous to mix novel and antinovel fact and faction news and entertainment auschwitz and dumbanddumber although sadoo might say its not the mixing its how you mix and if you mix well auschwitz and dumbanddumber stop existing not as historical events but as historical possibilities
oh bomb ah appears to nuance according to a specific clichéd genre but because the genres clichéd it actually doesnt nuance but strips nuance according to the dictates of an expected narrative which includes the faith in autohagiographization rumpoh also strips nuance but does so phrasefully yet is nuanced through the art of contradiction it equally autohagiographizes but because it does so overtly rather than covertly socalled progressives demonize it yet this is no different than catholics accusing protestants for their marketing methods or academics critizing undegreed peons for their different thinking these differences differences of method and religion and not virtue or spirit
is the question and its dispute
how quickly should we drive click fuck pray kill love eat shop tweet to the apocalypse?
so what are we objecting to? of course dumpy but there are many cogent voices already doing that so in addition to objecting to dumpy were also questioning any corollary virtue or nonobjection to those objecting including naturally sadoo any binarism between the socalled evil and the socalled good any disrecognition that even the socalled good or competent are necessarily operational within infrastructures and processes pervasively cancerous murderous unjust any disrecognition that scorn of one party hardly must praise alternatives any disrecognition that dumpys been great for the powered antidumpologists bolstered their power made them look far too righteous in contrast any disrecognition that we all participate in manufacturing dramatic situations and the production of appositive situations any abstraction or decontextualization between the orientations of dumpy and the orientations of a society we all participate in a society that itself is abstracted decontextualized sensational supremacist in myriad ways including that most insidious one of species violent whether this violence is direct illegal physical or legal laundered virtual linguistic
are our obsessions with whim card assian taylor tool oh bomb ah deleuzion aubrey graham & rebanna or whowhonymever disconnected from the brouhaha we say we despise? are we not bound together in a project that nothing strategic & sensible would admire?
and to close but not to close back to spiritual mathematix the crux of the issue an arrogance of etiology a reification of geometry
you find my thoughts jumbled?
ı find your thoughts jumbled
or rather ı find them ordered within a system
that requires a massive project of projecting jumbledness
fiction is not the same as
fiction
reality not the same as reality
not to honor whonyms of worth will keep the people from contention
a very real thing were objecting to in dumpy is history which in another very real sense is ourselves just look how fascinated so many of the antidumparians have been by the antics of the dump if they were really antı shouldnt theyve been reading aim us tootooola or demıly ıckınson truly giving evidence they have lived other values rather than binding themselves in time and energy to the very forces they claim to deny?
so of course we celebrate to the extent were still capable of celebrating dumpys demise and hardly discelebrate the new air and airess but neither can we celebrate them
in an environment where only a very few hoard the names power wealth fame how can we trust a media that on the one hand denounces dumpi and on the other continues to sustain and promote the system that produced him only through a schizophrenia which society projects on the few who assume the curses of society in their bodies
so we apologize to ourselves for this jumbled irrational and tedious yanking and we return to our hovel of constructive oneiricism and our cave of questions
i write this with my own irrationality
and not the irrationality of empire
signed on sadooday in sadoo
blessed are we who seem to be losers
