were sitting today here in a place of sitting at the deworld disconvention of the impossibility of communication with a badly number of crude and superficial experts on what are you experts on
were experts on thinking were experts
speak for themselves were experts on the impossibility of expertise
the newest expertise is that expertise that in hiding in ignorance becomes a detour around the very thing knowledge is seeking
theyre experts in the derisive capacity of expertise to undo the edificial structures that sustain the privileges inherent in the separations between those doing the experting and that being the experted
doktor ‘fukkys here unnaturally and the usual other charlatans but also some voids we dont recognize and of course an entirely meaningless welcome to all and were so glad to be here to talk about what are we talking about
were talking about whether the copulative has been able to effectively function between substantives since the wars of adpositioning and the subsequent pillagings or whether it while appearing to function that is sitting there like a senior executive fulfilling itself while manifesting in the comprehensive balances less than nothing consuming space for no reason other than as an ossification of a historical principle that never even in time or imagination was living but served only to perpetuate generative capacities of death
nephological and nephrological distinctions not disanalogous to those of ornithology orthography and orthology have presented to the literature conundra which panjandra snarl into imbrogli of erudition
the working classes of which we are fatefully not slouch for us as a synonym for a dreamt word we seek on the analytic couch of our violet indulgences which we nurture with emotions having the consistency of molasses the taste of turmeric and the texture of tetrafluoroborate
splashing in the neuroendocrinological sludge at the tipsy end of a hypothalamicpituitarygonadal axis i saw with hefty reservations my train sloughing forth from the woofing terminus like a nature video savagely consumed by engrossing cats
specifically theyd like to ask are sadoos pataphysicians and the corollary seemingly necessarily bound but not ostensibly necessarily so question are pataphysicians sadoos
as imam friedrich garbles there was only one christian and it lived two thousand years ago so we garble theres only one pataphysician and it lived a hundred years ago
that jesus may have been the first pataphysician …
is there only one sadoo?
and that chang doo?
the similarities are blatant and tragicomic as the raw healthy vital energies of the christ got quickly quashed by the pedantries of the construction of bishops priests cardinals masses within the expanding and expansive factory of an official and powerstarved christianity so the genius of the jarry is stolen and donned by the scholars and professionals of creativity to simulate auras of the alternative beyond and a daring so distant from their capacities who could geometrize a universe to contain them
let us smoke huqas of hashish and maassel and see in the qutrub potentialities of greater falls
are sadoo and pataphysic one or many or negative or zero?
or outside any mathematic
being word
i saw the mustelidae leave their little ones to return to the lightning
the patasadoo is the subject of doktor ‘muertes voluminous study gidouille and doodoo which disproves proof and in disproving voids
i went to the neighbourhood varsalum to seek the marvelous but found only larva muss
the question for us today is what does an institutionalized pataphysic look like?
its important to remember were only a century after its founding and the similaritys already been vomited xity a century after jesus hardly looked like xity in 1500 or 1900
but the acceleration of time
the rewarding of successful abstractions cant be overlooked and by successful we mean the mocking deconstruction of the judeochristiancapitalist monument in such a way that it serves
the monuments masochistic release needs and thus is rewarded by the monument thereby subverting the deconstruction
so judeochristiancapitalism becomes judeochristiancapitalismpataphysics
j jc jcc jccp
and merges with the cccp and the lgbttqqiaafuctpsho
the alphabet goes ever on and on
down from the void where it began
now far ahead the alphabet has gone
and i must follow if i can
pursuing it with lighted feet
until it joins some weirder way
where many raths and gimbles meet
and whither then? i cannot say
i want to sing for the ones killed in the ecstasy
if metaphysics is a hypersupercomputer spitting out gibberish with false gestures of meaning and physical reality a python eating a lion while a lion eats a python pataphysics is a drunken turd lurching across a falling sky
sex that one remaining ultimate physical activity is possible for the pataphysicist but only if laughter and fucking are indistinguishable if in fact the practitioner cums when it laughs and laughs when it cums it skews into aberrations that post the sex to pata
while death that other never happens
and sterrof the closet daoist has a dream and this the dream sterrof dreams
it is mcing a large thronging pulse of religious geriatrics who surge from the singing home of god into the profanity of out where slews of transports await and the pulse even in their ancient days shinny nimblely onto the tippytops of the transports which whisk away to parade the ups and downs of hauptstraße of jedestadt and the geriatrics of vim and holy jerk and fuck and much of screaming and halleluwah and many mores
and sterrof the closet daoist wakes up in a mood befitting the dream
when you communicate pataphysically and the tightend of your patatalk operates with capacity only in the physical realm and possibly with some capacity in the metaphysical realms where does communication go?
is sadoo just a patanym of pataphysic?
doktor ‘fyre abend has developed a costbenefit analysis of patanymics using pataeconomics
string theory is a mathematical pataphor and sadoo theory a stuffed crocodile
the growing gap between literature about pataphysics and pataphysics its increasing cerebralization
well have a pataaquinas soon
i want bookers in mine
but pata is merdre
throw out the merdre throw out the pata
it takes it meta
so i take it pata
to keep it meta would be commenting on its comment from any of the available discourses but that begs insufficiency for then we can only be two aspects of the manifoldlyaspected sphere or continue the meta until the meta gets exhausted
this exhaustion is academic discourse
and social media chitterchatter
as meta breaks the physical
so pata breaks the meta
and what is there to break the pata
not meta
only the circle back to the physical
to merdre
to merdre or merdre to not this is the clinamen
or waiting for that which is beyond pata
pataphysics is the first religion of human nonexceptionalism
daoism was at least its changdoo form
patadao patadoo
in the pataphysical attempt to not virtualizeabstract the world for that was the metaphysical age and it abdicated to technology but to wholly absurditize it which it may be abdicating to politics so that politics and technology who together doeth all things well may lead us stalwartly unto our unmitigated demisings
one cant be a theoretician of pataphysics for then ones a metaphysician
what do you call someone who operates on a pataphysicist?
doktor ‘ubu
pataphysics destroys theory through flights of served swerving turds
ita est ergo ita sit
ita est ergo ita non sit
ita non est ergo ita non sit
ita non est ergo ita sit
ita ita nonsit ergoer ergoest
ergaita nonsita erer ester esty estest
ergadoo sitadont nonersad dontadao pataest
saderpat dooest non itadoo
anyway thanks everyone in this place of sitting at this disconvention doing pataproving for everything thats not been done and none of us of course mean anything
let us smoke huqas
let us listen to the mustelidae rise to their returnings
let us
who could say no to the no
let us
yet another dumped play of the light of mind
inspired by the omnipresence of incomprehensibilities
and the giggle of the pretensions of communication
we talk to no end but more beginnings of talk