were writing a transcript of a tryalog among poutine peelingam and bidet real or imagined its hard to tell like everything thats read written dreamt lived and most of what we think incomprehensible futile pedantic irrelevant arcane pompous misanthropic misinformed deranged but its important and for this we shall release it to the galactic nothingness *********
loves euphemized stockholmsyndrome were held hostage by our feelings then become enamoured of and possessed by them its not only troo whonyms cant handle too much trooth we cant handle our hearts or minds or that great fury we systematically try to kill and randomly spasmodically minutely nurture langwich
my cat who isnt my cat has died spiritually from having no other cats to play with you know those whonyms who withdraw from whonym society despicable though it is and surround themselves only with cats or gerbils or mice or roaches look at what happens to them its no different with a cat especially if the cat only interacts with only one other whonym its like the proverbial two entities on a desert island everyone becomes mad of course this is more or less the same as whats happened generally in whonym society weve isolated ourselves from nature and animals our pets now are just whonyms in animal form and so we only have ourselves to play with and are completely collectively nuts which we dont see because weve withdrawn from anything that might tell us this its not quite the same as how my cats gone nuts because im saying my cats gone nuts because it doesnt have any of its own kind to play with my points diversity we need our own kind and other kinds my cats nuts because it doesnt have its own kind whonyms are nuts because they only have their own kind so its more or less the same
i used to be a lecturer then briefly a prof in communications i left for the same reason i left the church i didnt believe in it anymore weve explained this in biological and communication air let me give you an example
i move from babylon to stixvil stixvils beautiful but stixy its got all the pros and cons of stixiness the whonyms are weird in particular ways which makes them lovable and detestable simultaneously even the best whonyms are lovable and detestable simultaneously but theres a particular config in stixity and you know what im talking about anyway some lovable detestable best whonym got rid of my vynyl collection a few years ago its costing me thousands of dollars i dont have to begin replacing it im ocd about it funding it by pretending to be a gyaru on the internet men are pretty gross anyhoo i go the local stixvil record store and say hey i lost my vynyl collection and here are 60 titles id like i like to support local business though really i dont give a fuck and what can you do for me they say we can get 28 of your titles and herere the prices i say go for it doodaramas then the first two come in and theyre 50% more than the quoted prices i dont realize this till i get home and flip an email saying politely wtf they reply with some streamofconsciousness bs and i realize theyre run by the mafia or are corrupt or incompent or all three anyhoo this is really boring but im going to tell you anyway cuz im totally psycho about this shit so then i find out it could take years to get these titles and after the managers agreed to give me a 10% discount i realize its meaningless because theyre going to set the prices at whatever they do and i have no idea of what their markup is so fuck everything so in summary they dont tell me their prices are meaningless they dont tell me times wholly unreliable & they dont tell me their discounts a farce you say well its your fault dumbass and were back to the story of the hitted and the hitter and the arden of geden and love and everything really & sorta and this is why communications an article of faith and believing in its no different than believing some incorporeal omniscent omnipresent omnipotent eternal benevolent yeahright entity knocked up some whonym female to manufacture the saviour of the world save the world‽ yesu christou we cant save anything other than money and even that i cant
who are u in yr penitentiary of language & outhouse of mind to think anything of me other than im a rabbit of indeterminate colour hopping in a patch of absent rutabagas singing atonal progymnasmata to charters of nonexistence
*********
preamble
to wetzen the appetitus
its the twelfth of yorrowyore and supreme world leaders poutine peelingam & bidet are meeting at an undisclosed location in zoomania as each cant understand the others accursed languages there are considering the historic and desperate nature of these talks twelve translators one chinese to english one english to russian one russian to chinese one chinese to russian one russian to english one english to chinese and six backups while this transcript is only in english transcripts are also available exclusively in russian and exclusively in chinese the original manuscript in all three languages as it was apparently actually spoken has been absconded interpol has actively opened a criminal investigation and the worlds best minds and leading experts have been assigned
we have for the purpose of privacy assigned the codes of swl1 swl2 swl3 to the three supreme world leaders though not in any direct specific or even singular fashion likewise as the translators mutterings have occasionally improprietously and even unethically worked their way into the transcript for these weve used t1 t2 and so on through t12 again without explicit or singular assignment finally though scholars and journalists cant agree on source identity method various voices not clearly belonging to any of the aforementioned 15 seem to now and then invade the proceedings or the transcript the relationship at timess unclear and these despite broad savage disputes are labeled o1 o2 and so on until there are no more though the unreader should be aware that due to certain weakened methodologies of detection privacy epistemology designations relationships between designation and citation citations themselves may not as reliably conform to various standards posited among those who continue to however inevidentially or tenuously advocate forms of truth though the word itself is troubled beyond repair more replete forms of knowledge often seem to decry