The Normalization Thesis
So Dr.
Tooty-freudy comes to me and says (something like), Hey Jude, want me to throw a couple of projections in with your next
session? This one’s on the mouse. And i say, Hey doc, never hurts. And
that’s the way it goes. Squeak
squeak. That’s the way it goes, squeak
squeak that’s the way it goes squeak squea ...
The people say
choose choose the finite is all there is ... you have to be something you have
to be something you have to be something ... be an adult be a man be an
ape ... god is dead but he who said god is dead chose his not-choosing,
no-chose his choosing, like a god ... you always want someone to crack through,
to see the unseeable you think you see, to say it the way you think you do,
that person with the key
the one who jabs and jabs and fucks that narnian witch
like what the froggies did
to the algerians, it’s all good, it’s all right,
you’re gonna sleep tonight like a baby-o and dream
(Which dream is
your cloud and chain? Families of
dreams, like languages: the romantic,
the germanic, the tectonic, the blondiebeastie, the indie-european, the
fruttitutti, the fresh&wild, the lone&eddied, the khoi-san, the
neetcheenatzhee, the burushaski, the langwij sanwich, the glossoh!lalia, the ...)
Here are
the problems of identity. If one wishes
to maintain a cohesive identity, one has to sacrifice reality (though one calls
this sacrifice something like maturity, responsibility, sanity). If one wishes reality continuously, one
dies. If one wishes some compromise
between reality and identity, between spirit and flesh, between consciousness
and mortality, between dreams and potato chips, if one wishes some semblance of
reality, one’s identity morphs, partially and at times seemingly wholly, into
whatever objects present themselves to one’s so-called identity. With such compromise, one either travels into
undesirable places and has partial or little support for such travels,
resulting generally and specifically in mayhem, or one fabricates (that is, one
arts), which is the same as the aforementioned except for the fabrication.
The problems
of identity are not problems other than for those who require and/or acquire
them as problems.in through the bonking glass, out through the viewing
glass, abiit ad plures vixit mortuos plango cuntus obnoxicus prickus objectionicus
fungi4allofus amen
That’ll be $200 please. And your kids and your gonads for the
projections.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(The Secular Sadoo asks forgiveness of its readers on behalf of Blogger,
as various visual effects,
forms intrinsic to the content of this piece,
cannot be reproduced in this particular techno-context without undue effort.)
No comments:
Post a Comment