THE POET AND MONEY
aka … the discipline
and practice of madness
or … a
mystic’s quarrel with the
world
(in elusive instalments)
jabes, applied
What is the book i wish to recreate, a book of origins
without origin, a lost book, the siamese twin of the god i wish to recreate?
The attributes of this book, this god, are likewise lost;
this is why i approach my task tentatively, on paths of murkiness, setting
myself aside as one sets oneself aside when leaving a mirror.
The internet aids me in my groping, in my task, as the
printing press aided others in their quest of the book. They wished to make copies, to pass the task
of the hand to the machine, to promulgate the Word. I wish to return to the space before the
hand, to when copying was an idea and remained an idea. This wish i feel has something to do with the
book i seek to recreate … or rather (or equally) the book that seeks to
recreate me.
My book is
a record of my seeking for the book. It takes
place in the gloaming so i place it in the technology of the gloaming, its
wholly ambivalent invention. Whether dusk
or dawn (of the book? humanity? me? machines?) i don’t know.
My
book has no limits because my quest has none.
I must only seek the book without the book, in death but without
affirming death, in life but without affirming life, without even affirming the
book or the quest.
The
book is my body i cannot see yet cannot escape.
The internet, in its natural infancy, has been seen as an
extension of (has been used to extend) the powers of the printing press—more
copies; more rapidly disseminated; more swirl, dissent, reform—even as the
computer was initially seen and used as a glorified adding machine. But this is to ignore (through fear? ignorance?
novelty? surprise, as by ambush?) the internet’s natural powers, as our attempted
simulation of the mind of god, as the adimensional book (neither tower nor
library) of babel: nameless (because it
assumes all names), attributeless (because it assumes all attributes), powerless
(because it assumes all powers), limitless (because it assumes all limits),
without knowing (for knowing has walked past the end of itself), spaceless (for
it is everywhere), without extension (for extension is a function of time and
the internet is the mystics’ technology in its bypassing of time).
Humanity was
not defeated at the stunted tower at the beginning, nor was it silenced by the
library’s confined infinitude. Babel, to
fulfill itself, is to circumvent not only verticality but horizontality; it is
to translate the random emptiness and plenitude of blind borges from the
virtuality of a story to the story of virtuality, to explode it from the
confines of eight pages to the infinitely reproducing electrons of empty
freedom.
The
internet is Babel, the consummation of communication; through it we have
defeated god and in defeat have founded the visible asomatous quest for the book.
No comments:
Post a Comment