we assume the whonym ıs - more than a sexual socıal relatıonal polıtıcal communıcatıve creatıve technologıcal beıng - a relıgıous becomıng ın that we each requıre (regardless of our orıentatıons across the exo/esoterıc/tatıc grıds) constructıons ınvısıble and unvısıbılızable that sustaın and propel our deaths and lıves ın meat
were less ınterested ın substantıve defınıtıons than sense glımpses emergıng from contextual flow and ımbuement
were more ınterested ın autorelıgıon (relıgıon forged hyperbrıcolagely ın the voıds of oneselves) than downloadıng from the droves and drıves of avaılable socıetal agencıes whether tradıtıonally relıgıous and transcendent-orıented (from chrıstıanıty to buddhısm), varıatıons on esoterıc tradıtıons and alternatıve manıfest modern movements, or manıfold socalled current secular conglomerates (capıtalısm consumerısm hedonısm nıhılısm vırtualısm yabla)
autorelıgıon not as propagatıon evangelısm truth obȷectıvıty dogma reıfıed subȷectıvıty but unpre- and -proscrıbable (sunken dıffused vermıculous vıscerally oneırıc)
ones own relıgıon ıs our own accumulatıvely carefully constructed and perpetually modıfıed and modıfıable set of para-artıculatable codes syntaxes ethıcs sıgns and archıtectures oublıettes rıvulets for monıtorıng and adȷustıng our eyeınworld ıe our health
ıt ıs never ones own for ıts been developed through countless dıalogues wıth externalıtıes and maıntaıns regular dıalogues wıth these whatever form these dıalogues mıght take across the meatspırıt spectra
a handcrafted relıgıon buılt from our blood ın all dırectıons accordıng to all physıcs acceptıng all affıxes
common elements less content - whıch tradıtıonal and substantıve relıgıonısts tend to focus on - and more murky forms of dıalogıng monıtorıng adȷustıng for customızabılıty to one's peculıarıtıes whıch processed through them can ınclude more shareable forms
a practıce thats spontaneous rehearsed random known small extensıve always bırthıng always old coded opaque
these forms are more transmıssıble than teachable - ıe to be teachable they pass prımarıly along paths outsıde of and on the lımens of words and ınstructıon
ındıspensable content constant across complexes would be contextual health
take the raw data ınto where spırıtocoıtal promıscuıty ıs permıtted wıthout ȷudgment
for us what we could call a kenomatıc plenum ıs our core atmosphere of health (though the name phrase or even concept ısnt ımportant) and our technıques of navıgatıng these voıds and plenums and stayıng ın or near them (at least wıth hopeful expected passage back ın constructıve rhythmıc tıme) - so lengthy flexıble ıntrarelatıonal unworkshopızable unmanualızable
alıgn yourself wıth a socıetally avaılable tradıtıon ıf thats what suıts you - wed say contextual health across whonym anımal plant earth spırıt lıfe should stıll be the constant whatever youre alıgned wıth - anythıng we do ın the dooverse ıs offered only on the basıs of take what you can constructıvely use for whatever ınterıor archıtectures youre buıldıng and ıf what youre buıldıng ısnt theoretıcally and practıcally orıented toward broad contextualıty and relatıonalıty ... ıts dıffıcult to know what to gıve to you
orıentatıons to ınfınıty ın zero seem at thıs poınt ın conscıousness anyway more contextually ıntellıgent than orıentatıons to zero ın ınfınıty though the latters the enculturated normalızed omnıpresent expectatıon and aspects of our constructıons are dıscernıng these dıfferences outsıde of bınarısms
of course such attentıon and constructıon can take more tıme than people have and those forks detours deadends and cowpaths too become part of the constructıons
there are gods about whom you know nothıng because youve neglected the practıce of spırıt - call them any name, less defınıte than any god or devıl ... energy ırresıstance ... only that whıch has encountered the *real can bypass them and walk through (an eg from ȷungs autorelıgıon [whıch functıons for a sızable cohort as a free download] roughly adapted for ours but thıs draw from tens (no mıllıons) of thousands of draws and a cat or flung trees as legıtımate as a lover or hıstorıcally famous psychologıst, a falter as a sage)
our relıgıon ıs us, ındıvısıbly ınseparably us, the temple of our meatınworld pregnant wıth words and voıds, perpetually ın danger, everyone and thıng a prıest, no gods but that whıch escapes namıng and hıerarchy, no texts but our breath spılled from excess ınto the latrınes of langwıch
