esotatic

-->

coming soon at doktor jude peer

academia.edu

groundbreaking research on the esotatic

it talks the scripts about the scripts. i talk the scripts about the scripts about the scripts about the scripts about the scripts. so we’re barely able to communicate

it fortunately though in talking about the scripts about the scripts has many more humans to talk with than you do

fortunately?

the scripts about the scripts form the common discourses, divided by tribe into dialects and the dialects either can’t understand each other or fight, and the scripts themselves and the scripts about the scripts about the scripts the political and academic-artistic common discourses respectively, the scripts about the scripts about the scripts about the scripts thinking and poetry, already too far removed from the common to be accessible to those who don’t fluently speak the scripts about the scripts about the scripts (or speak fire directly, which is a different matter). the scripts about the scripts about the scripts about the scripts about the scripts though …

unfortunate and fortunate

like all the scripts in all their nests, but with different hues and trapdoors

we each wander in our verdant wastelands making sense to the humans of our scriptiness

or when you’re many rings away from scripts making sense – if at all – perhaps only to scripts and not to humans at all but almost nothing

but what about the scripts themselves

this is where i think it gets interesting – not in the scripts themselves, which, like the scripts about the scripts, are factories of cliché (the difference being that the scripts themselves are the clichés that form the clichés of the clichés) leading one to think that it’s clichés not just all the way down but all the way out. but this isn’t necessarily the case. for the scripts themselves depend on the fire of the energy of action – socially dominant humans simply being an energy that translates fire into cliché and for this they’re rewarded with fame and money and gonads and occasionally deposed – all this what the scripts about the scripts talk about, dominating their imaginations and language. but the further out you go the cliché can’t hold, it begins to break down, and history is the process of adding more rings (another script about the other scripts, another script about the closest script) to maintain distance from the cliché. some who talk the scripts about the scripts about the scripts about the scripts about the scripts also talk the scripts about the scripts about the scripts about the scripts and a few also talk scripts about scripts about scripts but once you get that distant from the action the scripts frankly become fairly tedious and it becomes a question whether the scripts about the scripts about the scripts about the scripts about the scripts aren’t primarily anymore scripts about the scripts about the scripts about the scripts about the scripts but scripts about something else … and what this something else might be – whether it’s possibly the same energy of fire that forms the scripts but with different translation tools and without the action – becomes, in part at least, the script for those who talk the scripts about the scripts about the scripts about the scripts about the scripts. this process of adding rings of scripts, the talking of the scripts about the scripts about the scripts about the scripts about the scripts about the scripts andor just the scripts with different translation tools, the talking of this andor … all this i call the esotatic

some, even you, would object to this seemingly linear stretching and would rather talk of an enfoldedness of the scripts, holographic and rhizomatic structures, that your so-called esotatic is a false geometry designed primarily to signify yourself because you’ve lost the ability to speak the scripts and thus lost significance

any worthy talker of the scripts about the scripts about the scripts about the scripts about the scripts admits this possibility and any other possibility that’s capable of being geometricized. or mapped. and what isn’t? it doesn’t change we think the esotatic or the discourse of and in the esotatic. all these geometries could easily be true and the stretching we’re emphasizing presently just a brief sojourn through certain arrangements that presently present themselves, without any particular commitment to them as system, even as script. and isn’t it partially this lack of commitment, that open mappedness, that are attributes of the esotatic and – we might dare to say – also attributes of fire

opening up of course the old wars of who legislates – the warrior, the poet, or the priest

in today’s terms – the politician, the creator, or the scholar

though wouldn’t we have to add the business mogul and the scientist

different ways to slide the why

and this script – what kind of script is it?

i have no idea. we blab. we blab our meat as it moves through meat

is blabbing scripting? how are blabbing and meat positioned in relation to fire?

we are flows of questions, the script collapsed into the script

z|z•‖┃☟┃‖•ÿῥῤñ-˚¨˚`˝´~ ͂ˉ˚

-->

while ao spare in the fervor of his visions reconstituted the sigil from its roots in summoning energies in the exoteric world to creating energies from the esoteric – a process as far removed from its origins as metaphysics from physics – here, in the 9 rolling hyperspheres of gløm, in this fervor inspired by the conjunction of koo-shqa and a wayward marmot, sadoo z|z•‖┃☟┃‖•ÿῥῤñ^-˚¨˚`˝´~ ͂ˉ˚ migrates equally as far away from that which migrated away … sigilizing at a distance from spare commensurate with the distance between spare and its predecessors, from ˙pataphysics to metaphysics

what achieves this?

nothing

the sigil is not located here or there, outside or inside. it does not refer to pre-existent entities in heaven, hell, or earth; nor does it provide the capacity to conjure from the subconscious. it does not refer, it does not provide. the sigil does nothing, creates nothing, curses or blesses nothing, helps or dooms nothing, is nothing

our sigils – their hierarchies and disorders, their names and numbers, glyphs and energies – are empty sets upon empty sets upon empty sets. they are devoid of magic and intent, representation and outcome, force and symbol, will and work, meaning, significance, association, nostalgia. they are devoid of themselves

one plays the 9 rolling hyperspheres of gløm by having two stacks before one : the first stack consists of overturned cards with the 81 names, the second of overturned cards with the 81 sigils. one proceeds by drawing randomly a card from the name stack and likewise a card from the sigil stack. this matching of name and sigil becomes the match until one redraws. one can also play other ways. any discourse you might have heard in previous or future texts of purpose or meaning is contrary to the 9 rolling hyperspheres of gløm

the authors would like to thank – and by wanting to, do – sadoo z|z•‖┃☟┃‖•ÿῥῤñ^-˚¨˚`˝´~ ͂ˉ˚ for its part, as well as ao spare and the anonymous creators of

clavicula salomonis lemegeton and related texts of medievality and prior, for theirs. we all work together across illusions of time and space in increasing abstraction to the attainment of nothing by also of its means

our 81 sigils and names may also point to, though also without meaning, the 81 voices of the members of the council of i, who argue around the table of nothingness, and these voicings can be considered in the matching of the names and the sigils

81 name-sigils

81 names         81 sigils

in 9 rolling hyperspheres of gløm (aka clads)

sadoo diaper, having been pushed by the great and terrible energy koo-shqa away from its myriad consumptions to turn the antenna of its body toward a receiving of 81 names or incantations and to develop in the unfoldings of calloohar 81 accompanying sigils to invoke smoke of the esotatic, what is called by some magic, to bring forth the evil of the human from its closets and cast it into the collapse, turned

a few minimal principles are sufficiently visible in the initial haze to present now, along with a draft set of 81 names. the rest shall unfold according to whatever turns and returnings turn

a few minimal principles sufficiently visible –

• the 81 names are set apart (made holy) in 9 clads, 9 per clad
• the clads themselves remain to be named and are presently numbered, from 0 to 8 (which admittedly is a kind of name for numbers as has long been argued are first words). the antenna is turned
• the 81 names, as names be, are not eternal but shift according to the rhythms of calloohar (which for those not attuned to time is a necessary reconstitution of time from the rjg-jcc [roman-julian-gregorian-judeo-christian-capitalist] calendar to new relations of i and flow, interiority and the pluralities of space)
• while there is a hierarchy to the clads, there is also not a hierarchy : the hierarchy suggests that those names in clads in 0 and closer to 0 change less frequently and with less spontaneous whimsy than those in 8 and closer to 8. within a clad itself there is an order but no hierarchy
• it should be made as clear as clarity permits in its muddiness that many outside the 81 belong in the 81 and those inside are also outside. 81 continues to reveal itself as the number of the union of names and namelessness, words and numbers, inside and outside, clads and sigils, calloohar and the rjg-jcc, alice and the dappleton hookah, …

the 81 incantations in the 9 clads in the format                       0 1 2

                                                                                                            5 4 3

                                                                                                            6 7 8

koo-shqa sadoo tatica f risotto merdia ooQ qam 0 t5 81	malabot ra-mot eclitia oneirica disquiet yabiz yorgiz alice 周 ashayapsilid	diaper xma798 limed patadadamadanada rolling hypersphere calloohar kalamata ypapantis shoesie clouseau irimias schmidt
anna gämperl go̊no̊pho̊rtidium conchiglioni di sfoglia mezze maniche rigate ziti corte maccheroncini canneroni buggatini girandole tortiglioni lisci farfalle riccioli insalatonde doppia radiator orecchiette mista gemelli gemara annellini gratatoni ditaloni e fieno caserecce atto:arto:auto idia møme fatic vattika alfreda of polystichum a book of jang ooq absinthia	bab-ilu nivi czo of ving heresiarch el-hajj malik el-shabazz bin zayed al nahyan bin hamad al thani ould abdel aziza bin isa al khalifa ould laghdaf rashid almubarak alhamad al maktoum alsabah issa ibn alia li bin mohammed al qasimi ibn sahrif bin said sultan bin talal ibn ibn abdul wahhab razzaq al-abdullah dikirullah firkin faruq zeeshan zafarullah azhar khairunnisa nazira el-melek maysoon zoraida zaynab umm kulthum umm umm shyb-niqquwath grotto crypta apojubavoid pawukon kali que hiva oa jalalabad asmar mandibles kįndęrsūrprìsês rorschach the khwaja karzai rawash hamid ashraf lal shastri babatpur bahadur radesh radish lol?	acitat orbita icandard zürn tlön ˚¨˚`˝´~ ͂ˉ˚ hapticos k yahohim elew almin daolah motmin 230419 2327 brada daobra alladah elyah budao marmot minmot ellah elodao yahlah now own low won cow cowl con col owl no ow lo on wo daohew daoyah yahmin ilsa q f q asli rd of the university of malachi apojubavoid mud bridge landing road marbra moo-shqa hylyvyl misla. arse theurrhea-goatia-notorialisia kokkinos p-dit marzipan andre the zama svank são yates thz fogitrea ces deux infinis du cauchemar flammagenitus wattswana gordie and cindi escherichia cocobacchanalia baht naht ilili baba rand a dink wank ilili not not
אַ שפּראַך איז אַ דיאַלעקט מיט אַן אַרמיי און פֿלאָט matroyshka tilda tilde nano sephirot gaia sheol dialevart log ogdoöogdoadicneahashtadashamawry r.toe moo- wyrd sphingosine sans wanderwörter wönderwǟrten areolae manasis	vaap de sistance roach 9 peaches zarifa ghafari maria polydamouri eyinfunjowo kasimaawoo faderera joooda aanuoluwakiishi mofeoluwa ododo kakistocracaticologist fwyle gastrostrofi is a clock a word?	blad curdimir speakoff iDust karkinikos j listid listafor poofessor gugel-huphendortz the rorrim! the rorroh! eurydice eudyptes euripides dysthymia ddj zoorück lorgnette goo-shee koo-shqa danog siffleux